Friday, 12 July 2013

London Film and Comic Con: An Interview with Nana Visitor

Probably best known for portraying Major Kira Nerys in Deep Space Nine, Jean Ritter in Wildfire and Elizabeth Renfro in Dark Angel, Nana Visitor has played a wide range of roles in her career. I absolutely loved her portrayal of the outwardly strong and resilient, yet inwardly vulnerable and insecure, former freedom fighter Kira Nerys on DS9, and was greatly looking forward to meeting her at LFCC.

Unfortunately, I apparently left my brain somewhere else during the interview, and completely forgot what I was saying mid-sentence. I had to resort to apologising profusely, whilst I desperately fumbled around in my mind looking for where the rest of the interview had gone! I've transcribed the interview with my brainlessness edited out.

Regardless of my absent-mindedness, it was an absolute pleasure chatting with Nana Visitor. She’s a truly lovely lady.

Hello, Nana Visitor! How are you?

I’m good, how are you?

I’m good! Now, you’re well known for portraying Kira Nerys on Deep Space Nine. This year now marks DS9's 20th anniversary; what was it like working on the show?

DS9 was such a huge pleasure. The best part was I knew – at the time – that it was a special show. I knew that I might not be able to get this kind of writing/direction/producing again, so I relished it. And I'm glad I did, because I'm so proud of it. The new fans of the show that come through – and you see them at these things, people who've just discovered the show – and it proves that it has longevity.

Out of all the Star Trek series, it was arguably the darkest and grittiest. Quite often that darkness focussed around Kira, her family, and the Cardassian Occupation of Bajor. How was it for you, performing these stories that often got really dark and intense?

You know, it was hard to wash the grit off at the end of the night. It was a dark part. These days, she would probably be diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, I would say, and be treated – that probably would have been a great storyline if during those days we knew the treatment for it.

So yeah, it lived with me. I remember having Kira dreams. At night I would have dreams of being chased by Cardassians and things like that. So yeah, it stayed with me.

Having Marc Alaimo in full Cardassian make-up chasing you down corridors...

Yeah! Nightmare!

How did you feel about Kira's character development? Going from the stand-off-ish Bajoran liaison to becoming essentially the commander of the station.

I thought it was appropriate. I thought it made relationship sense, it made evolutionary sense for her as a sentient being. She would gradually come to trust and know and respect these people.

Could you relate to Kira's character? Was there much of yourself in your portrayal of her?

Absolutely. The striving, the dealing with having flaws and having the humility to see them and admit to them, and do something about them or not... It was wonderful in that way.

How did it feel to play such a strong, resilient and independent character?

I wasn't really aware, I just knew how I thought she should be, and I did get some push-back from people saying that it wasn't Star Trek, it wasn't right and I was just being bitchy. But I decided long ago that my allegiance is with my character and people's perceptions are people's perceptions; there's nothing I can do about it. So I stayed pretty true to what I thought she was.

In terms of character development, how did you feel about her relationship with Odo?

At first, no, I didn't want it. I thought it was so wonderful that there was a real, deep friendship between male and female, and it was such a cliché on every TV show that you get two people together; it always ends up romantic as if friendships can't exist. But in the end, I thought it was a wonderful story and it was a sweet love. People seemed to really respond to it.

I felt very much the same way about it. At first I wasn't sure it was the best course for the characters, but as the story continued it seemed more and more like a natural development. Well, as natural developments come when it's between a Bajoran and a Changeling!

Anyway, thank you very much for your time. It's been an absolute pleasure talking with you.

And you too.

Enjoy the rest of your weekend!

---

Unfortunately, my brainlessness chewed up quite a bit of time, and I would've loved to chat with Nana Visitor for much longer had most of what I wanted to talk with her about not been wiped clean from my memory! Nevertheless, it was an absolute pleasure to meet her: she's a genuinely lovely person (and very understanding of brain-dead interviewers!).

Visit www.nanavision.com for the latest news about Nana Visitor and her work.

London Film and Comic Con: An Interview with René Auberjonois

I’ve been a fan of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine for many years; it’s my favourite series set in the Star Trek universe, and ranks in the top five of my all-time favourite SciFi shows. Out of all of the series’ characters, I found myself most drawn to Odo, portrayed by the brilliant René Auberjonois.

Auberjonois has played a wide array of characters in his long and distinguished career, such as Father Mulcahy in MASH, Frasier Crane’s pink-satin-dressing-gown-clad mentor Professor Tewksbury in Frasier, and of course DS9’s security officer Odo, to name but a few.

When I heard that Mister Auberjonois would be attending LFCC, I knew I couldn’t miss the opportunity to talk with him. Although things had to be cut short due to a queue forming behind me, it was absolutely fantastic to chat with him: he is genuinely a most excellent gentleman.

Hello, Mister Auberjonois! A pleasure to meet you, sir. How are you?

Hello! I’m well, and you?

I’m well, thank you.
First of all, I just wanted to say how much I loved your portrayal of Odo on Deep Space Nine. As this year marks the 20th anniversary of the series, could you please describe a little about what it was like working on DS9?

Well, it was a gift. It came at a wonderful time in my life, and it was a great character to portray, and a lot of wonderful people to work with; not only the other actors, but the crew and the directors, the writers... It was getting to be part of an ensemble for seven years, which is a really rare opportunity in this very unstable business. It was great.

What would you say was your favourite thing about Deep Space Nine?

Well... The ongoing story, the complexity of the stories and the characters, and I liked the fact that compared to the other versions of Star Trek, I think Deep Space Nine is the most gritty and dark and perhaps neurotic. That appealed to me, because it's more complex.

And no matter how alien any of the characters were, there was always this sense of... Well, humanity is probably not the right word to use, but it's the only word we have! Every character had this sense of humanity about them, and Odo in particular started to develop a burgeoning sense of humanity that grew as the series went on.
How was it portraying Odo's character? Were there any aspects of yourself in the role?

Well, I think any actor who creates a character, there are aspects of his own personality that come through into the character. Not the complete picture of who I am, of course...

I'm not suggesting you are a shape-shifter!

Obviously I'm not a shape-shifter! There's a lot of Odo's sense of integrity I like to believe is part of the way I've learned to live in the world, and his sort of covered sense of humour is something that I feel I brought to the character. I'm a character actor, that means I play – and have throughout my life – many different characters, and Odo in his flexibility to be able to shape-shift, and the fact that he was masked in a way, seemed to me like a kind of symbol of what I do as an actor.

And as a character, he grew a lot throughout the series. Especially when he discovered his own people, he became a new person.
How did you feel about his overall character development as the series progressed?

It was always an adventure to get the scripts each week, to see how the story would evolve, and I would say that in the end his returning to his people – to the soup – was inevitable. He had been sent out by a planet, a community of creatures, that were very fearful and paranoid about what was out there. In the end he has to serve as the healing force, and return to where he had come from.

Well, as it appears there's a queue gradually growing longer and longer behind me, this'll have to be the final question. How did you feel about Odo's relationship with Kira? Was it a direction you could see the character going in?

Well, it was a surprise to both Nana and I. It was not anything we had anticipated, and it really wasn't anything that the writers had anticipated. It seemed to evolve out of their friendship, and it was a very interesting aspect which – to a certain part of the audience – was very important, and they responded to it with great passion. So, in the end, although I think both Nana and I thought “where did that come from?”, I think we were both very satisfied with that development.

Thank you for your time, it was an absolute pleasure, sir. Enjoy the rest of your weekend.

Thank you, and you too. Take care.

---

I wish I could have spoken with René Auberjonois for longer, about his current work and his support for Doctors Without Borders, but unfortunately I had to move on due to the queue forming behind me. It was absolutely brilliant meeting him: he's a truly fantastic gentleman.

Visit www.renefiles.com for the latest news and updates about René Auberjonois’s and his work.

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

London Film and Comic Con 2013: An Overview

This past weekend, the annual London Film and Comic Con took over Earls Court Two, bringing a host of celebrity guests, comic book artists and purveyors of unique merchandise to the venue. This year's event boasted a wide array of guests, with stars from the likes of Doctor Who, Game of Thrones, Star Wars and Star Trek. As this year marks the 20th anniversary of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (my favourite of the Trek series), LFCC 2013 celebrated the occasion with a great selection of the stars from the show; needless to say, I was looking forward to meeting the cast of one of my all time favourite SciFi series!

Once more armed with my dictaphone, a notepad and a sonic screwdriver that doubles as a pen, I set course for Earls Court Two.

Earls Court Two is somewhat of a place of nostalgia for me. I first came to this venue two years ago for my first ever London Film and Comic Con (actually, that's a lie – I really first came to Earls Court to audition for the role of Tom Riddle in Harry Potter many, many moons ago, and was less than successful, but that's another story!). LFCC 2011 was my very first convention, and also the first event I covered as a member of the press, having only started writing for Step2TV a month beforehand. There hasn't been another Showmasters' event held at Earls Court Two until now, so it was strangely nostalgic to be back there again this year... They say you always remember your first, and I still vividly recall my first interview: it was with Mark Sheppard (Battlestar Galactica, Supernatural, Doctor Who). We had a long discussion about his character on Battlestar, Romo Lampkin, followed by a slightly shorter conversation about his favourite cheese (manchego).

It was also at LFCC 2011 that I first met friend, colleague and co-conspirator Josh Harris, where we talked at length about Doctor Who whilst stood next to the DeLorean waiting to interview Christopher Lloyd (there's a time travel joke in that somewhere...). Befittingly, for LFCC 2013 Josh and I rallied at Clapham Junction and made our way there first thing Friday morning to set up the stand for Subversive Comics – for whom Josh works – and for me to pick up my press pass for the weekend.

Friday night marked the beginning of the event, opening with a preview evening where a handful of the guests were providing autograph signings and photo opportunities. The venue wasn't overwhelmingly busy, but considering that this was just a two hour preview there was still a considerable amount of people – a large amount of whom had already come in costume! I spent my evening taking a look around the various stalls that had been set up, chatting with some of the visitors and exhibitors, and attempting to plan out the weekend ahead.

Day Two, Saturday. It was ridiculously, unnecessarily hot. I know a lot of people enjoy the heat of the sun, but whenever this time of year comes around I turn into an angry summer goth. In hindsight, it was probably an unwise decision to wear black jeans with a black t-shirt and black jacket... It was impressive to see the amount of cosplayers who remained dedicated to their costumes and their roles in this weather – I can't imagine it's particularly comfortable being a PVC-clad Catwoman or full-armoured Iron Man in heats exceeding 28°C!

I attempted to grab a couple of interviews with a number of the guests for the afternoon. I had my eyes set primarily on the cast of Deep Space Nine and Stargate (Amanda Tapping and Jason Momoa; unfortunately, Michael Shanks and Claudia Black had to cancel their appearance).

The first guest I was able to interview was René Auberjonois. Amongst the many, many roles in his long and distinguished career, Auberjonois is probably best known for his portrayal of my favourite character in Deep Space Nine, Odo, and Father John Mulcahy in MASH (and, if you dress him in a pink satin dressing gown, you may remember him as Professor Tewksbury from an episode of Frasier). I was fortunate enough to grab ten minutes with Mister Auberjonois, in which we discussed his time working on DS9 and how he felt about Odo's character. Unfortunately things had to be cut short as a queue had started to form behind me, but it was an absolute pleasure talking with Auberjonois for the time I had. He's a genuinely excellent man.

In addition to meeting the fans and signing autographs throughout the weekend, Auberjonois was also collecting donations for Doctors Without Borders, a secular humanitarian-aid, non-governmental organization whose volunteers provide urgent medical care to victims of war and disaster regardless of race, religion, or politics.

My second interviewee was Nana Visitor, Kira Nerys on DS9, and chatting with her proved to be one of my most memorable interviews to date! We started to talk about her experiences working on DS9 (including the resultant nightmares of being chased by Cardassians), and things were running smoothly... Until I forgot what I was saying mid-sentence. My brain literally ground to a halt. All I could do was profusely apologise for my apparent lack of brain cells, and prolifically perspire in the sudden uncomfortable heat I was experiencing. Thankfully, Visitor relating her tales of also occasionally forgetting what she's saying (arguably in a worse situation, performing on Broadway and completely freezing up) gave my absent mind some space to breathe and cobble together some vague semblance of the interview I had initially planned out. It may not have been my finest hour, but it's certainly an interview I'll remember for quite some time! Visitor is a truly lovely lady, and an absolute pleasure to chat with.

Sunday being Sunday, things were a bit more relaxed and nothing was more relaxed than London Underground's service that morning! I arrived a bit later than I had the day before, and set about attempting to arrange the interviews for the day. Among those who I planned to chat with were Avery Brooks (Captain Sisko, DS9), Amanda Tapping (Sam Carter, Stargate SG1 and Dr Helen Magnus, Sanctuary) and Jason Momoa (Ronon Dex, Stargate Atlantis, Khal Drogo, Game of Thrones), however I had been informed that their agents were incredibly restrictive about interviews. Again it was advised to try again towards the end of the day when hopefully the extensive queues would start to grow shorter. As such, I decided to return to having a look around the convention, occasionally returning to the guest area to try my luck with the queues.

I stopped by the Sea Shepherd stall to see some friends I'd met at previous conventions and at Sea Shepherd demonstrations and protests, and I was fortunate enough to meet one of Sea Shepherd's esteemed Captains, Peter Hammarstedt. I have the utmost admiration and respect for the work that the Sea Shepherd crew do to protect our oceans' wildlife, and I honestly can't stress enough how important everything they fight for is.

On the note of good causes, Amanda Tapping was also promoting the charity she started up with writer/producer Damien Kindler and Jill Brodie, Sanctuary for Kids. I was unable to formally interview Tapping over the weekend, but I was able to introduce myself and tell her how much I admired the work she was doing with S4K. Sanctuary for Kids is a charitable organisation dedicated to helping children in crisis across the world, raising money and working with small charities such as the Watari program in East Vancouver, Nepal Orphans Home, Asha Nepal, Next Generation Nepal and SOPUDEP in Haiti.

After speaking about the work she does with S4K, Tapping noticed my Sea Shepherd badge. Of course, her Stargate co-star Richard Dean Anderson is a very prominent supporter of Sea Shepherd and a member of their Board of Advisors, having worked with Sea Shepherd founder Captain Paul Watson for many years. So we also discussed Sea Shepherd's work, how she herself had also met Captain Watson, and the Captain's present situation following his unjust arrest in Germany last year under false allegations. Despite not being able to interview her properly, it was fantastic finally meeting Amanda Tapping, and even more so to discuss the causes we both feel passionately about.

Around mid-afternoon came the event I'd been looking forward to for most of the weekend: the Q&A with the cast of Deep Space Nine. The guests for this interstellar line-up for the Q&A were Avery Brooks, Alexander Siddig, René Auberjonois, Andrew Robinson, Armin Shimmerman, Nana Visitor, Salome Jens, Aron Eisenberg and Max Grodenchik. Among the things discussed were how the cast first got into acting (Auberjonois said it was because he “didn't know any better,” Shimmerman simply answered “girls”), and if they had to choose a different character to portray, who would they be (Auberjonois: “I would have been Morn.” Shimmerman: “I wish you had been.”). The mystery of what happened to Captain Sisko's baseball at the end of the series may also have been partially solved, as the subtle clues – and Brooks's suspicions – all seem to point towards Nana Visitor...

All in all, LFCC 2013 was a brilliant and memorable event. I met and spoke with a number of fantastic people, and had an overall highly enjoyable weekend. Interviews and transcripts of Q&As will be up soon, and will be linked to below.

For more pictures from LFCC 2013, please visit my website at www.bronjames.co.uk

London Film and Comic Con returns with a new winter event in October this year. 
Visit www.collectormania.com for more details on London Film and Comic Con Winter and for more of Showmasters' upcoming events.

Sunday, 30 June 2013

The Ocean at the End of the Lane by Neil Gaiman

In his first adult novel in over eight years, famed fantasy author Neil Gaiman takes us to the landscape of his childhood for a journey of memory, magic and survival in a world just beyond the veil of reality... To the Ocean at the End of the Lane.

Anyone who knows me knows of my love for Gaiman and his work. From Stardust and Neverwhere to his episodes of Doctor Who, I've thoroughly enjoyed the strange, fantastical – and yet seemingly real and tangible – worlds that Gaiman conjures up. The Ocean at the End of the Lane is a perfect example of this: a world that's simultaneously completely fictitious and yet entirely and believably real. This is, in part, due to the fact that Gaiman draws on elements of his childhood for the setting and impetus of this dark and fantastical tale, and his usual engaging narrative style immediately sucks you in.

Told through the memories of our narrator, a forty-something man recalling a time in his life through the eyes of his seven-year-old self, the narrative is as much about childhood and growing up as it is about a world of fantasy and monsters. The book tells the story of the protagonist encountering beings from other worlds, things that exist just outside of our reality (and may very well be more real than what we call reality), but more than that, it tells a story about the powerlessness of childhood, as we attempt to make our way in a world we barely understand. This is probably the biggest thing that separates this book from children's fiction. In Gaiman's more child-friendly works, such as Coraline, he tells children that they can be powerful, that they can triumph over darkness and overcome seemingly impossible odds. But in The Ocean at the End of the Lane, the protagonist is burdened by the role he unwilling has to play in this story, and is powerless against the extra-dimensional entities he's faced with, let alone against his own parents!

In many ways, that's the scariest part of this book: not the entities and not the struggle against the darkness, but the overwhelming sense of futility and hopelessness felt by the narrator. It takes you back to those times in childhood when the world was far bigger and scarier than you could even begin to imagine; a world inhabited by giant grown-ups who were invariably right; a world in which you very rarely were able to have any real form of influence or control (a large reason why I buried my head in books in my formative years, and have yet to truly emerge into the “real” world...). It's a powerful way to convey a story, especially one where sometimes the monsters feel more like a metaphor for the unknowably daunting challenges of the real world we begin to discover as we grow up. To feel the vulnerability of childhood from an adult perspective is a sombre and humbling experience, and is something that Gaiman accomplishes brilliantly in this book. The Ocean at the End of the Lane may be a book for adults, but is very much written for the children these adults used to be.

Not only has the book been ranked Number 1 Bestseller
by the New York Times, and signed by the man himself,
it has also earned the highly-coveted position on my
Coffee Table of Excellence™!
The story which frames the allegory of childhood is also a fantastically realised world of magic, wonder and darkness. We're introduced to the magically mysterious yet earthly and everyday Hempstock family who live on the farm at the end of the lane. The youngest of them, Lettie Hempstock, claims that her duck pond is an ocean. The oldest can remember the Big Bang. These characters are so matter-of-fact about things that would otherwise seem abnormal that you don't even question it, you just allow yourself to be carried away into their weird and wonderful world; a world that's always one step beyond logic.

There are also, of course, dark, monstrous things from beyond our narrator’s reality, things that should never have been summoned to this world, that are brought forth when the lodger commits suicide in the family car (an event based on a true story from when Gaiman himself was seven - whether the entities that are summoned and the events which then unfold are also true remains unknown!). I shan’t go into more detail about the narrative that ensues, because this is a story best left unspoiled and delightfully surprising, but what I will say is that it is incredibly engaging. I devoured the first ten chapters as soon as I got the book on the night of the 17th of June (to be honest, I can’t even remember getting home; one minute I was in the theatre, then I was seven-years-old and encountered the thing that called itself Ursula Monkton, and the next I was back home!), and persuaded myself to read only one chapter a night to prolong the experience.

From what started life as a short story for his wife, Amanda Palmer, The Ocean at the End of the Lane has become a genuinely brilliant novel. Through this story, Gaiman conjures up those oft-forgotten worlds of magic and adventure, capturing the essence and innocence of being a child again, but also leading us to that bittersweet taste of childhood’s end. It is a wonderful and poignant tale, and worth every tug at the heart-strings.

It's an adult fairy tale, a modern day myth, and a bloody good read!

You can read a transcript of Neil Gaiman’s Q&A at the Royal Society of Literature on the 17th of June, talking about the inception of The Ocean at the End of the Lane, here.

Monday, 24 June 2013

An Evening with Neil Gaiman: Memory, Magic and Survival

The magnificent Neil Gaiman has been doing that thing again recently where he flies all around the world in a remarkably short space of time, like a novelist Father Christmas, visiting all the good bookshops and literary societies to give them the gift of his latest book: The Ocean at the End of the Lane.

I was fortunate enough to catch Gaiman on his whistle-stop tour of the UK for a Q&A at the Royal Society of Literature (and a couple of nights previously in the Apple store on Regent Street), where he discussed his first adult novel in over eight years and how it came to be. Chairing the Q&A was the Guardian's literary editor, Claire Armistead.

Tell us about The Ocean at the End of the Lane.

The Ocean at the End of the Lane is the first novel I've ever written completely, one-hundred percent entirely accidentally. Any other time I've written a novel, I've known I was going to be writing a novel, I knew what kind of a novel it was going to be, I knew the shape of the book, and then I went off and wrote it. I knew that Stardust was going to be a thin book that would feel like a fairy tale; I knew that American Gods was going to be something the size and shape of a brick, and that it would be a big, rambling thing; I knew that Anansi Boys was going to be a funny book about the length of a P.G. Wodehouse novel, because that was the kind of thing I wanted to make.

But The Ocean at the End of the Lane... It was last year and my wife, the inestimable Amanda Palmer [there's a whistle from the audience] – thank you, she is very whistle-worthy – she had gone off to Melbourne, Australia. She had gone to Melbourne to make an album, which eventually she finished, it's called Theatre is Evil, and I didn't expect really to have a problem with this. I thought, 'I'll go off and write.' And then I discovered that when your wife goes off to make an album, she winds up in another relationship with the album that she's making, that kind of excludes you. I actually understood this, because I'm pretty much like that when I'm writing a novel; I batten down the hatches and everybody else in my life just shrugs and waits for me to come back out again. But in this case I was really missing Amanda, and she was gone, she was sending me happy texts, telling me how her album was going, and that was about it... And I thought, 'I miss her. I'll write her a short story, that's what I'll do...'

Some years ago, about 2003, I bought a mini. And I really liked the mini; I loved things about it, like the fact that I was in proportion to the new minis out there, roughly the same size that I as a small boy had been to our little mini. There was a very nice consistency to that. I remember just talking with my dad – he'd come out to America – we were talking about minis. And I said: “You know, you used to have that lovely, little white mini. I loved that car. Why did you get rid of it?”
He went, “Ah. I've never told you that story, have I?”
And I said, “No. You have never told me that story.”
“Well, we had a lodger. He was South African. He'd come over from South Africa, and he'd smuggled out lots of money with him from his friends that he'd promise he'd bank for them. He had lots of money with him. He came to England, and he discovered the casino in Brighton. Initially, he lost all his money, and he only planned to dip into his friends money until he'd made all of his money back, but then he didn't have anything. He came home, stole our car, drove it down the lane and he killed himself in it.”
And I said, “What?!”
“Yep. I sold the car that afternoon. I knew your mum would never get back in it, ever again, and that was the end of that car.”

My reaction to this anecdote was not sorrow for somebody who had died, it was instead this weird seven-year-old resentment that something interesting had happened that I hadn't known about! I was the kind of kid who thought interesting things happened in books, but never happened in real life, and something had happened and I hadn't known... So that sort of sat there at the back of my head, and I kept thinking 'wouldn't it be interesting if I had known' or 'if that were a story, where would that story have gone?'

Then Amanda goes away, and I missed her, and I thought, 'you know, do a story. I'll do Amanda a story.' She doesn't really like fantasy very much, but she likes me, and I tried taking her to places I had lived before, just to show her what they look like. I kept having to go, “but this isn't actually what it was like when I lived here, because now they've built houses all over it.” So I thought, 'I'll take – not the family, but the landscape – of the world I grew up in and I will have a character who is a lot like a seven-year-old me, who lives in books a lot, and I'll set it in that landscape, and it will be a short story. Then I'll send it to Amanda, and then she'll be happy that I've done this thing for her. Then I'll get on with the real work that I'm meant to be doing while here in Florida, like writing an episode of Doctor Who that makes the Cybermen scary, and the other stuff that I'm meant to be doing.'

So that was my plan. It was a really good plan. After several weeks, I looked around and thought, 'you know, this isn't a short story. It's a novelette. They're about 10,000 words, it'll be one of those.' And somewhere in the middle of the following week I thought, 'well, it's obviously a novella.' Then I kept writing it. A few weeks later, I sent an email to my lovely editor Jane Morpeth over here, and my editor Jennifer Brehl in America saying, “I just need to warn you: I appear to be writing a novella. I have no idea what we'll do with it once it's done, but just so you know there's this thing that I'm working on.”

And then I kept writing it... Amanda finished her album... She came to Dallas to mix her album, and I flew in and spent the first couple of days sitting in coffee shops just finishing the book, and then I started typing it. Every night, I would read her what I'd written before bed, and then she'd fall asleep. I have told people that story and they go, “weren't you upset?!” I say “No!” I loved it. She'd wake up the next morning, and I'd ask her where she'd remember up to, she'd tell me and I'd start from there.

When I'd finished the end of that week, I'd finished typing my second draft, and I did a word count. I sent a very surprised email to Jane and Jennifer saying, “I appear to have accidentally written a novel.”

So that was the book. Not necessarily what was going on inside my head as things were being written, but those were the circumstances in which the book was written. It was, from my perspective, a very small, personal book, and I wasn't expecting the reactions I started to get.

I did a signing the other day in Bath, that started about nine-thirty (pm) and finished at one (am), and there were actually people coming up on stage at one o'clock in the morning saying “it's really good.”

[He reads an excerpt of the book – I won't transcribe it, you'll just have to read the book, which you should anyway, it's really bloody good.]

It's interesting that these monstrous creatures make their entry by giving away money. Is this a sort of anti-capitalist statement?!

Not really. It's much more to do with how peculiarly important money can be when you're a kid, because you don't actually have an income source. I, as a kid, was fascinated with money, because I couldn't really understand it; you got it from your parents. Sometimes you'd be really lucky and somebody would come to stay, a friend of your dad's, and they'd actually give you half a crown. Power! I could go into a sweet shop and buy everything I wanted! I could go into a bookshop and buy two books!

So I loved the idea, because we have the suicide and the suicide is driven by money, and I liked the idea of a creature who was by its own rights not evil, trying to do good by people – trying to give people what they wanted at least – giving people money in ways that possibly were not entirely the best form. So that was really where that began, and then of course as the story carried on I had to find out what it was that was giving them money, and once I had created a big – I don't want to give away too much, you've got to read the book – but you encounter relatively soon Ursula Monkton. Ursula Monkton was enormously fun to write. And she always comes with both names; occasionally she's referred to as the thing that calls itself Ursula Monkton, but I liked the idea that she was like Mary Poppins.

Mary Poppins from Hell.

Absolutely! But Mary Poppins is always Mary Poppins. She's never Miss Poppins or Mary, she's Mary Poppins. I thought, let's do one of those, but much darker. Mary Poppins is basically a sort of beneficent God that comes into the Banks children's lives. And I thought, 'what happens if the thing that comes into their life is nowhere near as beneficent?' That was the starting point for Ursula Monkton, who is a monster.

Can you tell us something about the different ways you start work on stories for children and stories for adults, and if there's ever a fork in the road where you have to decide which of the two to follow?

What a great question, and it's absolutely relevant to this one... When I started it, I had no idea. I wasn't actually categorising it as children's fiction or adult fiction, I just went “I'm writing a book, this is fun.” Actually, I didn't, I went “I'm writing a short story, this is fun.” I didn't have to worry.

As it went on, I started to have to actually think about things I'd never thought of before in terms of what makes adult fiction and what makes children's fiction. Occasionally in the margins of the notebook I was writing in, I'd leave little notes to myself. I remember writing... I don't actually remember writing it, but I do remember noticing in my handwriting the words “in adult fiction, you're allowed to leave in the boring bits.”

I think one of the things that decided me on the idea that this was adult fiction that I was writing, even more than the material because you are seeing everything from a child's eyes anyway, was the idea that in children's fiction I am perfectly happy to make villains as dark as I like, to make things as dark as I like, but I always feel that a book needs to be about hope. It has to be about ways you can cope with the darkness, ways you can deal with it. The quote from G. K. Chesterton that I made up that begins Coraline, where I say that fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten. That is the important thing about Coraline.

This is not a book necessarily about defeating dragons. Definitely not a book about telling kids they can be powerful. It's actually a book for adults who have forgotten about the powerlessness of childhood. You have your own wonderful things you can do, but you're also living in a world inhabited by giants. You've turned up in this place where you didn't even speak the language; you were definitely not issued an instruction manual or anything when you turned up. You're just here, and there's this occupying power, and they're enormous. You can't even argue with them, because they can always pick you up and move you. So I wanted to try and put that into my story as well.

One of the things that people keep saying to me about The Ocean at the End of the Lane when they've read it, is they tell me about things that they had forgotten about being a child. That made me ridiculously happy. The stuff that you forget just because you don't go there, and then you can read a book where you are taken there, and suddenly bits of your childhood that you'd completely forgotten can come back.

Let's talk a little about the farm and Lettie's family, the Hempstocks. You get an idea from that extract that she's older than she might be for an eleven year old. Where did they come from? Are they witches?

The Hempstocks began for me when I was about 8 or 9, when somebody – probably my mum – told me that there was a farm down our lane that was mentioned in the Domesday Book. So it was almost a thousand years old. As a kid it didn't occur to me that a thousand years ago the farm would have looked very different, I just assumed that this nice red-brick farm had been standing there for about a thousand years. And then I thought, wouldn't it be interesting if the people who lived there had lived there for a thousand years. And that thought never quite went away.

They were called the Hempstock family, and they had lived on the farm down the lane for about a thousand years, and they were sort of very old, very magical, and nobody ever noticed them. I liked that. As I became an adult, I kept expecting to write a story about them, but a story never turned up with them in. So every now and again, when I was writing something else, I would put one of the Hempstocks in: Daisy Hempstock turns up in Stardust; and then when I was writing The Graveyard Book, I put Lisa Hempstock – who's witchy – I thought, 'good, she's witchy, she'll be in there.'

I think, looking back on it, what I failed to notice about the Hempstocks and the reason I never wrote a story with them in, is I had never written a story set in my lane before. So suddenly, I had this idea: I'll do a story set in my lane, and my father's mini – obviously, there will be bad stuff.

What are they, are they witches? No, they're not witches. Somebody asked me last night - the screenwriter of the film of this, or the person who will be writing the script, I won't say who it is because I don't think it's been announced yet – but his first question was, “is there anything that I should be researching to understand the Hempstock family? Is there any myth you can point me to?” and I said “no.”
“Are they Pagan? Are they magical, Pagan...?”
“No. They pre-date all that. That's new-fangled stuff to them.”

I like the idea that, Old Mrs Hempstock – the oldest of them – remembers the Big Bang. Lettie claims that her duck pond is the ocean, and she says they came across it when they came from the old country, and her mother says that Lettie can't really remember properly because the really old country sank beneath the waves. And Old Mrs Hempstock says that the really old country blew up. So I loved the idea that they were just very earthy, very practical ladies, who dragged their farm half-way across the Universe from the dawn of time, ripping weird stuff up and bringing it with them, and plonked it down at the end of the lane. That's what the Hempstocks are. And they're looking after things. Quite how much they're looking after you never really know...

Certainly keeping bad things out.

Definitely keeping bad things out. They obviously have a job, and part of their job involves just making sure that bad things that come in get dealt with.

Leading on from that... In much of your work, the mythical and the modern merge and conflict. Do you feel that myths are still important in modern culture, and why? Are you creating them, are you tapping into something, or...?

I love myths. I'm a huge myth-junkie. I've loved myths since I was six years old, I may have loved them before. I remember being given a copy of Roger Lancelyn Green's Tales of the Norsemen and just going “This... is brilliant. This is so much cooler than anything else.” Then I got to the story where Loki and Thor and a kid named Thialfi take refuge for the night in a very peculiar house: it's got five branching passages and a big branching passage, they can't really make sense of the geography of it, and it turns out it's a giant's glove.

I saved up my own money, and bought a copy of Roger Lancelyn Green's Myths and Tales of Ancient Egypt...

Which appears in the book.

Which appears in the book! And I have that book still. I just loved that, I loved these animal-headed Gods, loved those stories. So I have always been fascinated by myths; I've always loved letting them drip and trickle into my fiction. There's a moment in The Ocean at the End of the Lane where our narrator is reading some myths, and he says what he likes best about myths is that they aren't for adults, and they aren't for children, they just are. That is still how I feel about them. I can go back and read old myths, I can go back to – these days I don't go back to the Roger Lancelyn Green ones, I go back to the Prose Edda or the Poetic Edda – but I can still get the same joy and thrill as I did as a kid.

There's a thing that comes out very strongly in the way that you talk about children's books in this, that they have huge, violent back-stories. The character says that he loves books about Egypt, because it's about animal-headed Gods that cut each other up and then restored each other to life.

Definitely part of the fun of myths is that nobody is particularly sugar-coating anything for anyone, and kids love terrible things happening. There's that terrifying satisfaction on the face of a kid when something really awful happens to a bad person, it's like “yes,” and you'll read like Grimm's Fairy Tales: “And the Queen was forced to wear iron shoes, and they heated until they were red hot, and they clamped them on her foot and then they made her dance until she died.” It's only when you become an adult that you start going, “oooh, that's not really very nice.”

I love that children's books run all the way through this book, and my publishers actually got in touch with me at one point because they wanted to make sure that any permissions had been gotten for the quotes from classic children's books that I had in the book, and I had to admit that I made them up.

When I was a kid, I read everything; absolutely anything I could find lying around, I would read it. But we had all of my mother's books, that my mother and my aunt read. We had books about girls who could not leave their ponies when the Nazis came. I got to make up some of those in this book, when he goes off to read them, so that was enormously fun. There's a point when you get Sandie, who has been sent off by an administrative error because she's Sandie -ie rather than Sandy with a Y, and has gone off to the wrong school, but it's all worked out very well because she's discovered that her geography teacher is a Bolshevik spy.

But there's a difference between your main character in this and those main characters, in that your main character is powerless. He doesn't fight the good fight and win, whereas the classic trope thing is that they do.

Absolutely. I'm very proud of my main character. It's true, though. He screws up a lot. Several of the things he does actually cause more bad things to happen. At one point he gets himself into deeper trouble – he does escape, a brief escape – he climbs down a drainpipe. He's learnt to climb down drainpipes because kids in books climb down drainpipes, and he feels he has an obligation.

And you've made that point, that it's not a plastic drainpipe like we have today, it's a good old solid drainpipe. There's another point you make, like you say, it's the oddest thing that we used to have gas fires in rooms. It's much odder than a witch or a ghost turning up in your room.

I think it's because I was writing the book, sitting there writing it, and I'm going “well, okay, if this thing had happened to him he would now be drying off... He'd be in the bedroom...” I kept the geography, very much, of the house and the grounds – I played with it a little bit, it's fiction, I moved things around – but basically it's pretty factual. I got to thinking that he would have done what I would have done. I would have gone into the bedroom, I would have lit a match, lit that gas fire and dried off in front of that– you know, that's really weird, the idea that you'd have a five year old and a seven year old with their own gas fire. That's kind of dangerous. In fact, looking back on it, I had a pair of red pyjamas that had a huge hole in the sleeve, and somehow managed not to drip burning plastic from nylon pyjamas that caught fire from that fireplace onto anything, except me...

And I thought, that actually seems more unlikely than anything else that I have written so far, and there's some really weird stuff in this book. So I put that in. It's just something you wouldn't do today. Wouldn't happen. I'm sure Health and Safety people would turn up at your house... With clipboards.

So you can write about horrific things as long as they're in the realm of the imagination, but as soon as it involves reality...

It was fine. I do not want anyone to think that my parents were in any way not looking after us, because this was just how it was! It was just a house that had a gas fire in the children's bedroom... So yes, I'm very good at fiction, but when it's real then that's very weird...

---

It was an absolute pleasure to listen to the writer whose work I have admired for some time discuss his latest book at length, and I found myself feeling considerably more inspired with my own writing afterwards. Gaiman's fantastic new book, The Ocean at the End of the Lane is now available from all good bookshops and online, and is absolutely well worth reading. My review of the book can be read here.